The following is from the April 2009 Drilling Down Newsletter. Got a question about Customer Measurement, Management, Valuation, Retention, Loyalty, Defection? Just ask your question. Also, feel free to leave a comment.
Want to see the answers to previous questions? Here’s the blog archive; the pre-blog newsletter archives are here.
Q: I’m a social media consultant, facing the interesting challenges of measuring success, and wondered, what are your thoughts on social media measurement and life time value? The two seem to go together, but if anyone has thought about it, you would have. Would love to know your thoughts.
A: Just to be clear, the following is specifically about social for use as a Marketing platform, not as a utility or a way to keep in touch with people. Interacting with other people can create a lot of value – emotional value for the participants. There are obviously lots of great uses for social platforms and I’m sure there is more to come in that area. The question is: does any of this make sense as “media”?
Continue reading Measuring Social Media Value
(A post by post index of this Marketing Bands Series is here.)
Just wanted to add a quick piece about the results of Optimizing the Bands (see Band Model) – this is the Marketing Productivity Blog after all! Thanks Moe for the reminder.
As we Optimized, there were changes in budget allocation by Band, and as a result there was an increase in Net Customer Value – the goal of the Optimization program in the first place. For those of you not following the whole story, the budget remained constant, we simply allocated it to the highest and best use through testing.
Continue reading Marketing Bands: the Numbers
Optimizing Individual Communications
Where the Band 4 Optimization optimizes general communications like newsletters, the Band 5 Optimization is all about hyper-targeted communications to individuals. We’re talking mostly about special circumstance stuff here, more exotic ideas that may actually fall outside what you might traditionally think of as “Marketing”.
If Band 4 is the “Air Cover“, Band 5 is Special Ops (see Band Model).
In Band 5, you basically have algorithms of various kinds that are “sniffing” the databases looking for special situations that have exceedingly high ROMI. Often, these ideas deal in one way or another with high value customers that appear to be dis-Engaging; many of these scenarios related to Marketing, Service, or Product in one way or another.
Continue reading Peak Engagement (Band 5)
After the lessons we learned in the Band 1 and 2 Optimizations (see Band diagram) for HSN, we were able to reallocate that budget to invest in Band 3 – Optimizing the Interface. We realized during the previous Optimizations we were already getting a tremendous amount of traffic through channel surfer / clickers, but this traffic was not “converting”. In other words, we really needed to Optimize the “Landing Page” for this existing audience – the TV show itself.
Don’t suppose the above scenario sounds at all familiar to the web analytics folks out there – you know, “more traffic, any traffic” is the answer? Oops, maybe not, what about higher conversion?
I won’t bother providing the Band 3 example for the web; you all know what Optimizing Landing pages / web sites is about, or can certainly find that info elsewhere. However, you might find the Optimization of a TV shopping channel interesting…
Continue reading Optimizing the Interface (Band 3)
Now that we’ve had some discussion on the ideas behind these charts, let’s dig deeper into the Marketing Bands chart and review details at each level (click for a larger image in a new window):
What we have here is a chart of the optimized interactive Marketing Bands system we developed at HSN, with an overlay of comparable online Tactics in red (Band numbers in Blue).
After nearly a decade of testing, we arrived at the place where each dollar of marketing spend – at each level – yielded the highest profitability to the company. Many of the examples here pertain directly to web marketing, and I promise I’ll be specific on that.
Continue reading Optimizing Marketing Bands 1 & 2
So, we had some good “translation” discussions on the HSN Marketing process document, and the idea that there are a couple of ways to look at “Segments”.
It’s my belief that if you start with Communication Segments (an idea we finally arrived at with the HSN Optimization in 1993) and then move to Visitor or Customer Segments, you will end up with a clearer, more actionable picture in the end.
If each Band has a single Objective, and you Optimize to this single Objective, you will end up Optimizing the entire system because Visitors / Customers naturally flow down through the Bands as they pass through the LifeCycle.
There’s really no concrete benefit, on either side, to send the same message to all the folks in these different Bands. That approach is inefficient at the least and irritating to the customer at the most!
Continue reading Online Marketing Bands
Not sure if all the web analytics folks out there will appreciate this post, but I’m pretty sure at least some of you are interested in how all the things we talk about in the Web Analytics / Database Marketing world fit into the larger world of Marketing. So following on a question from Judah on depth of segmentation, and a post you should read from Gary on joining behavioral and demo / psycho segments, I thought I would offer this example.
One of the challenges people seem to have with behavioral segmentation is finding a way to organize it in their mind. It just seems too overwhelming to think of Marketing to individuals at the “right time” based on behavior as opposed to some “calendar” idea where you communicate to everybody at once.
If you want to create a “structure” or “process” to hang behavioral communications on, try this one.
Below is a chart I created in 1993 to explain what Marketing looked like at HSN (you can click for a larger image in a new window):
Continue reading Your Segment or Mine?