Well, the call for a new Online Marketing Requirements doc to correct the Wrong Model, Dumb Money problem did not get much traction so far. So I’m thinking maybe you need a new Online Marketing Model first to hang the Requirements doc on. Fair enough.
Here’s the challenge: I don’t think there is a universal enough agreement on what online brings to the Marketing party. Sure, it gets explained in tons of ways, but for the most part these explanations are all Tactical stuff – do this, get that.
That’s not good enough, that’s too small, and it’s not unique to online. CEO’s and CMO’s are looking for the Strategy edge, and they are looking for ways Online is a “logical fit” into the Marketing Mix. What is online “for”, and perhaps more importantly, what can it do better than what we already have?
This is important because if you can get to this place, then you have leverage, then you have the ability to draw more money into Online Marketing / Analysis – because it is different.
Continue reading New Online Marketing Model First?
Trying to figure out why Online Marketing and the Technology that supports it keeps Repeating Past mistakes, I arrived at the conclusion Technology and Marketing shared the blame by using the Wrong Model and spending Dumb Money, respectively.
But I was not satisfied with that conclusion either, still seemed not to be Root Cause – I still had to ask, why?
Why, with all the smart people around the industry, all the brilliant technology innovation, do we have the Wrong Model / Dumb Money problem? Why does Online continue to mimic an inferior Offline model, instead of creating a new one, unique to itself?
Then it hits me. No requirements doc. So simple.
Continue reading No Requirements Doc for Online Marketing?
I am not a technophobic Marketeer, an old “resistant to change” type. In fact, I’m just the opposite, and that’s why I can’t understand why Online continues to Repeat Past Marketing Failures.
I was one of those kids that built crystal radio sets and messed around with ham radio. My favorite place to hang out was Radio Shack, back when they were an electronic parts house. I built all kinds of circuit board stuff with a soldering iron, mostly bugs and telco hacks. I was a geek when they were called nerds.
In 1977 I learned the BASIC language and was writing simple programs for the mainframe at college. In 1978, I was part of a small group of students who worked on the Synclavier, the first large scale truly digital music synthesizer. I started working with PC’s in 1987, and had a home computer by 1991. I was one of those people who dialed up to the CompuServe Forums at 300 baud, primarily talking about computers and music, figuring out how to rewrite .bat and .ini files to get the computer / keyboard interfaces working properly.
And at the same time, making lots of “online friends” ;).
Continue reading Wrong Model, Dumb Money
I think this is probably the last Learning and Teaching issue in Online Marketing (series starts here) before attempting to evaluate and summarize the challenge. I would like to receive comments from you on the Sherlock Holmes Problem.
“There are two types of minds — the mathematical and what might be called the intuitive. The former arrives at its views slowly, but they are firm and rigid; the latter is endowed with greater flexibility and applies itself simultaneously to the dive.”
— Blaise Pascal
In his post How the Skills of a Night Auditor Translate into Web Analytics, Christopher Berry explores a notion we have wrestled with a lot while developing the WAA’s Certified Web Analyst Test – can you teach someone to be curious in a “business analytics” way? Or are people just born with / socialized into this skill set? How do you measure and test someone for “analytical curiosity”?
We have referred to these issues internally on the Education Committee as the “Sherlock Holmes” problem. The issue is not the ability to read and interpret reports, or write up findings, or anything like that. It’s the ability to see coincidences or oddities in the data, to conceptualize linkage or relationships others don’t see, to follow the data trail (or blaze it) right down to Root Cause.
Continue reading Sherlock Holmes Problem
I’ve been trying to get a few things straight in my head about the way people Learn Online Marketing.
Will you help me?
Here’s a Premise:
The Online Marketing world seems to repeat the same mistakes over and over; it’s almost like every new generation of technology is a clean slate and somehow people expect an approach that was flawed in a previous generation won’t be flawed this time.
Sure, technology changes, but the fundamentals of human behavior are much more difficult to change. So you would expect there to be some constants, right?
For example, putting a high value on “quantity” of activity (remember Hits?) when every past generation has found that “quality” ends up as a more important metric.
Continue reading Repeating the Past