<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off the Marketing Richter Scale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jimnovo.com/2009/02/27/marketing-richter-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2009/02/27/marketing-richter-scale/</link>
	<description>Moving from a Low Accountability to a High Accountability Business Model</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Sep 2010 13:05:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is the Internet making marketers stupid?</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2009/02/27/marketing-richter-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-75741</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Internet making marketers stupid?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/?p=293#comment-75741</guid>
		<description>[...] recently three of the world&#8217;s largest ad agencies made statements that went off the marketing Richter scale. “… We have already become too lazy and proud and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently three of the world&#8217;s largest ad agencies made statements that went off the marketing Richter scale. “… We have already become too lazy and proud and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2009/02/27/marketing-richter-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-63810</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/?p=293#comment-63810</guid>
		<description>lechsam, agreed.  I think part of the problem - especially online - is that a whole generation of folks grew up thinking Marketing = Advertising.  Advertising has never been anything other than a conduit for ideas.  The ideas start way back in Marketing, and no amount of Advertising will fix flawed Marketing Strategy.  If you have to run tons of Advertising to sell your products, there is something wrong with your Products, not your Advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lechsam, agreed.  I think part of the problem &#8211; especially online &#8211; is that a whole generation of folks grew up thinking Marketing = Advertising.  Advertising has never been anything other than a conduit for ideas.  The ideas start way back in Marketing, and no amount of Advertising will fix flawed Marketing Strategy.  If you have to run tons of Advertising to sell your products, there is something wrong with your Products, not your Advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lechsam - brand excellence</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2009/02/27/marketing-richter-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-63345</link>
		<dc:creator>lechsam - brand excellence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/?p=293#comment-63345</guid>
		<description>Operational excellence is the driver; it was and always will be.  Industry leaders (often times brand leaders) such as P&amp;G and Johnsons&amp;Johnsons understands this and that is why their efforts to connect with customers produce the favorable responses they do.  

Branding is not dead. Nor is a brand an empty concept. It does however seem watered down because many, through their gamut of fads, dicey literature, blogs and other forms of public media have blurred its definition, meaning and purpose within an organization. Branding is a window to a company&#039;s soul; its people, its operations.  It is a concise way of explaining what an organization is... be it as a whole or for a specific division.  Only with a solid operational foundation can a company deliver on its promise and offer consumers something of real value.  Only through its rigorous pursuit of R&amp;D can Windex (a J&amp;J brand) provide &quot;a streak free shine&quot; for windows without the presence of unwanted chemicals and with a more pleasing scent (to most) than plain Jane vinegar and water.

The spiral which has taken place is due in part to the blatant disregard for keeping things simple. The lack of ingenuity to be truly different has resulted in varied degrees of the same truth being preached by evangelists with little regard for true excellence. In the lavish days of &quot;prosperity for all&quot;, the sentiment was: the company with the most money to throw at a campaign wins the consumer, regardless of its flaws (to which the also prosperous consumer turned a blind eye). 

Today, things have changed, money tree budgets have shrunk to mere roots... full circle. Back to basics and the realization that a large budget is no cure for operational inefficiency. Consumers’ values have been realigned with real value, something broken companies (broken brands) cannot deliver, regardless of their branding efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operational excellence is the driver; it was and always will be.  Industry leaders (often times brand leaders) such as P&amp;G and Johnsons&amp;Johnsons understands this and that is why their efforts to connect with customers produce the favorable responses they do.  </p>
<p>Branding is not dead. Nor is a brand an empty concept. It does however seem watered down because many, through their gamut of fads, dicey literature, blogs and other forms of public media have blurred its definition, meaning and purpose within an organization. Branding is a window to a company&#8217;s soul; its people, its operations.  It is a concise way of explaining what an organization is&#8230; be it as a whole or for a specific division.  Only with a solid operational foundation can a company deliver on its promise and offer consumers something of real value.  Only through its rigorous pursuit of R&amp;D can Windex (a J&amp;J brand) provide &#8220;a streak free shine&#8221; for windows without the presence of unwanted chemicals and with a more pleasing scent (to most) than plain Jane vinegar and water.</p>
<p>The spiral which has taken place is due in part to the blatant disregard for keeping things simple. The lack of ingenuity to be truly different has resulted in varied degrees of the same truth being preached by evangelists with little regard for true excellence. In the lavish days of &#8220;prosperity for all&#8221;, the sentiment was: the company with the most money to throw at a campaign wins the consumer, regardless of its flaws (to which the also prosperous consumer turned a blind eye). </p>
<p>Today, things have changed, money tree budgets have shrunk to mere roots&#8230; full circle. Back to basics and the realization that a large budget is no cure for operational inefficiency. Consumers’ values have been realigned with real value, something broken companies (broken brands) cannot deliver, regardless of their branding efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Is Richter Scale</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2009/02/27/marketing-richter-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-63061</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is Richter Scale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/?p=293#comment-63061</guid>
		<description>[...] Off the Marketing Richter Scale » Marketing Productivity Blog &#8230;Off the Marketing Richter Scale. Man, what a month in Marketing land. First, you have one of the largest Ad Agencies in the world admitting their business model is broken, because agencies are not in charge of the fundamentals of &#8230; Read more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Off the Marketing Richter Scale » Marketing Productivity Blog &#8230;Off the Marketing Richter Scale. Man, what a month in Marketing land. First, you have one of the largest Ad Agencies in the world admitting their business model is broken, because agencies are not in charge of the fundamentals of &#8230; Read more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
