<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chief Friction Officer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/07/22/chief-friction-officer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/07/22/chief-friction-officer/</link>
	<description>Moving from a Low Accountability to a High Accountability Business Model</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:26:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/07/22/chief-friction-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-38947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/?p=227#comment-38947</guid>
		<description>Really, FUD?  In pet supplies?

As you said, &quot;depends on what and where you’re selling&quot; and I&#039;d add it also depends on the general tone of your communications and relationship building methods with customers.  We guarantee all our products and use a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/01/05/flat_rate/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;flat rate shipping model&lt;/a&gt;, so no games there.

We&#039;re talking about a very low tech product here, it just is what it is, and there isn&#039;t really any kind of &quot;FUD lever&quot; available.  In this particular case, the product was indeed priced for liquidation so we felt pretty sure that was what was going on (we know the product / supplier very well).

Don&#039;t you find it interesting that the relationship we have developed with customers is such that they would even take the time to engage in this kind of &quot;I would really rather buy it from you&quot; query?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, FUD?  In pet supplies?</p>
<p>As you said, &#8220;depends on what and where you’re selling&#8221; and I&#8217;d add it also depends on the general tone of your communications and relationship building methods with customers.  We guarantee all our products and use a <a href="http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/01/05/flat_rate/" rel="nofollow">flat rate shipping model</a>, so no games there.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about a very low tech product here, it just is what it is, and there isn&#8217;t really any kind of &#8220;FUD lever&#8221; available.  In this particular case, the product was indeed priced for liquidation so we felt pretty sure that was what was going on (we know the product / supplier very well).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you find it interesting that the relationship we have developed with customers is such that they would even take the time to engage in this kind of &#8220;I would really rather buy it from you&#8221; query?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/07/22/chief-friction-officer/comment-page-1/#comment-38738</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/?p=227#comment-38738</guid>
		<description>Jim, re your point #2 in the exchange. A possible reason.

That reason (on sale or a liquidation item) may be perfectly true, but it sounds like pure FUD. It may depend on what and where you&#039;re selling, but any such response back to me like that would leave a *really* sour taste in my mouth.
It may simply be that the alternate retailer is a more efficient and streamlined operation and can hence shave their margins even thinner.

eg The company I deal with most who tends to be more $$ than others, focus on other aspects. Quality of the end product - they &quot;stand behind it&quot; vs selling any old functionally equivalent junk that has the lifespan of 2-3 months.
The other trick they play is that postage is included in their pricing. Some online stores charge around 2-3 times the shipping of others - make their margins there I guess. So you &quot;save&quot; on the item, but get more $$ on the total package.


So how would I choose to deal with this situation? (So as not to be negative entire :-) )
I&#039;d do similar to your start: Great price. And then choose to focus on the Value Add that I offer to the customer. Some/Much/All of that value add may not be valuable to them. Which I&#039;d regard as a useful learning experience in it&#039;s own right.

Dissing the competition subtly or not just doesn&#039;t come off well IMHO. Better to demonstrate the intangible (or tangible!) values you do add.


Thoughts?
Cheers!
- Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, re your point #2 in the exchange. A possible reason.</p>
<p>That reason (on sale or a liquidation item) may be perfectly true, but it sounds like pure FUD. It may depend on what and where you&#8217;re selling, but any such response back to me like that would leave a *really* sour taste in my mouth.<br />
It may simply be that the alternate retailer is a more efficient and streamlined operation and can hence shave their margins even thinner.</p>
<p>eg The company I deal with most who tends to be more $$ than others, focus on other aspects. Quality of the end product &#8211; they &#8220;stand behind it&#8221; vs selling any old functionally equivalent junk that has the lifespan of 2-3 months.<br />
The other trick they play is that postage is included in their pricing. Some online stores charge around 2-3 times the shipping of others &#8211; make their margins there I guess. So you &#8220;save&#8221; on the item, but get more $$ on the total package.</p>
<p>So how would I choose to deal with this situation? (So as not to be negative entire :-) )<br />
I&#8217;d do similar to your start: Great price. And then choose to focus on the Value Add that I offer to the customer. Some/Much/All of that value add may not be valuable to them. Which I&#8217;d regard as a useful learning experience in it&#8217;s own right.</p>
<p>Dissing the competition subtly or not just doesn&#8217;t come off well IMHO. Better to demonstrate the intangible (or tangible!) values you do add.</p>
<p>Thoughts?<br />
Cheers!<br />
- Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
