<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Social Media&#8221; that Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/03/19/social-media-that-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/03/19/social-media-that-works/</link>
	<description>Moving from a Low Accountability to a High Accountability Business Model</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 20:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/03/19/social-media-that-works/#comment-20115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/03/19/social-media-that-works/#comment-20115</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.   

What continues to baffle me about Social is why they would rely on an old media model (display ads) when there is so much more they could do that would be "in-line", as opposed to counter to, the way these networks work and flow.  PPC ads, for example, are very much in-line with the work flow and intent of the user.  That's why they work so well.

For a supposed group of "brilliant" and "ground-breaking" folks, this attitude is pretty hard to swallow.  Yet it's still "build it and they will come".

Reminds me of the whole "hits" era, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.   </p>
<p>What continues to baffle me about Social is why they would rely on an old media model (display ads) when there is so much more they could do that would be &#8220;in-line&#8221;, as opposed to counter to, the way these networks work and flow.  PPC ads, for example, are very much in-line with the work flow and intent of the user.  That&#8217;s why they work so well.</p>
<p>For a supposed group of &#8220;brilliant&#8221; and &#8220;ground-breaking&#8221; folks, this attitude is pretty hard to swallow.  Yet it&#8217;s still &#8220;build it and they will come&#8221;.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the whole &#8220;hits&#8221; era, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK SEO Services</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/03/19/social-media-that-works/#comment-20108</link>
		<dc:creator>UK SEO Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2008/03/19/social-media-that-works/#comment-20108</guid>
		<description>Interesting suggestions. Personally, I find the likes of MySpace and Facebook to be too hit and miss for this type of advertising. Targeting, as always, is the key - something Facebook, at present, doesn't seem to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting suggestions. Personally, I find the likes of MySpace and Facebook to be too hit and miss for this type of advertising. Targeting, as always, is the key - something Facebook, at present, doesn&#8217;t seem to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
