Comments on: They’ve Ruined Wednesdays http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/ Moving from a Low Accountability to a High Accountability Business Model Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:27:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: 7 Sins, a Lack of Logic and Wikipedia-Haters « Brett’s Blog http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/#comment-17129 7 Sins, a Lack of Logic and Wikipedia-Haters « Brett’s Blog Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:31:39 +0000 http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/#comment-17129 [...] They’ve Ruined Wednesdays: Jim makes a great point on when the best day to send emails is. You gotta zig when they zag! [...] [...] They’ve Ruined Wednesdays: Jim makes a great point on when the best day to send emails is. You gotta zig when they zag! [...]

]]> By: Jim Novo http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/#comment-15076 Jim Novo Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:19:03 +0000 http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/#comment-15076 Hi Steve - The lack of a margin of error in many web studies is indeed an ongoing problem, as is the non-disclosure of population composition... Oh well, we do what we can... All I know is when "everybody" wants to drop e-mail on Weds because it's the "most productive" day, I don't want to drop mine on that day. Hi Steve - The lack of a margin of error in many web studies is indeed an ongoing problem, as is the non-disclosure of population composition…

Oh well, we do what we can…

All I know is when “everybody” wants to drop e-mail on Weds because it’s the “most productive” day, I don’t want to drop mine on that day.

]]> By: Steve http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/#comment-15026 Steve Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:21:31 +0000 http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/12/26/best-email-day/#comment-15026 I found it fascinating that there was no "+/- 3%" error factor or similar. That would do wonders for the numbers presented and the relevancy thereof. ;-) Let alone what different groups do. Folk @ work; Folk @ home etc etc etc. And I do love your ironic final logic Jim. :-) Cheers! - Steve I found it fascinating that there was no “+/- 3%” error factor or similar. That would do wonders for the numbers presented and the relevancy thereof. ;-)

Let alone what different groups do. Folk @ work; Folk @ home etc etc etc.

And I do love your ironic final logic Jim. :-)

Cheers!
- Steve

]]>