<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Al Gore &amp; Warren Buffet: Marketing Gurus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/</link>
	<description>Moving from a Low Accountability to a High Accountability Business Model</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:46:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Research That Makes You Go Huh, Volume 2 &#171; Marketing ROI: Whims from Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/comment-page-1/#comment-13108</link>
		<dc:creator>Research That Makes You Go Huh, Volume 2 &#171; Marketing ROI: Whims from Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/#comment-13108</guid>
		<description>[...] Volume&#160;2 December 4, 2007 Posted by rshevlin in marketing.  Tags: Market Research, marketing trackback  Brandweek reported on a new survey of &#8220;leading marketing executives&#8221;, members of agroup call MENG (Marketing Executive Networking Group). The study produced some findings that have at least a couple of us going &#8220;Huh?&#8221; Some of the more confounding points relate to: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Volume&nbsp;2 December 4, 2007 Posted by rshevlin in marketing.  Tags: Market Research, marketing trackback  Brandweek reported on a new survey of &#8220;leading marketing executives&#8221;, members of agroup call MENG (Marketing Executive Networking Group). The study produced some findings that have at least a couple of us going &#8220;Huh?&#8221; Some of the more confounding points relate to: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/comment-page-1/#comment-12779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/#comment-12779</guid>
		<description>That explains it Ron!

Seriously though, I wonder if people just read this stuff and nod &quot;Uh Huh, must be true&quot;, or do they really pay attention to sources and biases and weed out the crap that makes no sense? 

Even more of a challenge, what happens is this stuff gets picked up by (cough cough) &quot;News Services&quot; and then spread over the entire web as &quot;fact&quot;. 

I suppose what happens next is &quot;Senior Marketing&quot; people use this crap to make decisions?

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That explains it Ron!</p>
<p>Seriously though, I wonder if people just read this stuff and nod &#8220;Uh Huh, must be true&#8221;, or do they really pay attention to sources and biases and weed out the crap that makes no sense? </p>
<p>Even more of a challenge, what happens is this stuff gets picked up by (cough cough) &#8220;News Services&#8221; and then spread over the entire web as &#8221;fact&#8221;. </p>
<p>I suppose what happens next is &#8221;Senior Marketing&#8221; people use this crap to make decisions?</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/comment-page-1/#comment-12771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/11/30/rfpr/#comment-12771</guid>
		<description>It was a typo. It isn&#039;t &quot;senior&quot; marketers they talked to. It&#039;s &quot;senile&quot; marketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a typo. It isn&#8217;t &#8220;senior&#8221; marketers they talked to. It&#8217;s &#8220;senile&#8221; marketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

