<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ***** The Medium is the Metric for Online Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/</link>
	<description>Moving from a Low Accountability to a High Accountability Business Model</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:26:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment William, I guess I’m guilty of not being clear on my position.  I’m with Ya on the In-source thing, if your company has the talent.  If not, Outsource.  

Either way, my point was I have seen analytical efforts provide the highest benefit when they are centralized so that you get both consistency of platform / metrics and 3rd party analysis that is not subject to the data torture often prevalent in the silos.  How we get there is still up for debate, and I submit the CEO melt-down scenario is probably the most likely route at this point.  This is, of course, a reactive model and it sure would be great to have a proactive substitute for analytical panic – knowing it is going to happen, what can we do now to prevent it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment William, I guess I’m guilty of not being clear on my position.  I’m with Ya on the In-source thing, if your company has the talent.  If not, Outsource.  </p>
<p>Either way, my point was I have seen analytical efforts provide the highest benefit when they are centralized so that you get both consistency of platform / metrics and 3rd party analysis that is not subject to the data torture often prevalent in the silos.  How we get there is still up for debate, and I submit the CEO melt-down scenario is probably the most likely route at this point.  This is, of course, a reactive model and it sure would be great to have a proactive substitute for analytical panic – knowing it is going to happen, what can we do now to prevent it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Gaultier</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>William Gaultier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Jim, have been a subscriber of your newsletter for a while, and finally responding to one post. I agree with Ron Shelvin above, this function should be IN-sourced. We actually had a client recently say &quot;We know you are our agency of record, but we really want to control the analysis of data internally&quot; and I suspect many more to come. On the note of multi-channel analytics, I thought I&#039;d mention that we have recommended two partners to our clients who really seem to &quot;get it&quot; and really have figured out how to take duplication of results (and a whole lot more) coming from offline and online. Check them out Blackfoot Interactive (http://blackfootinc.com) and Database Marketing Services (database-marketing.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, have been a subscriber of your newsletter for a while, and finally responding to one post. I agree with Ron Shelvin above, this function should be IN-sourced. We actually had a client recently say &#8220;We know you are our agency of record, but we really want to control the analysis of data internally&#8221; and I suspect many more to come. On the note of multi-channel analytics, I thought I&#8217;d mention that we have recommended two partners to our clients who really seem to &#8220;get it&#8221; and really have figured out how to take duplication of results (and a whole lot more) coming from offline and online. Check them out Blackfoot Interactive (<a href="http://blackfootinc.com" rel="nofollow">http://blackfootinc.com</a>) and Database Marketing Services (database-marketing.com).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Novo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Novo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>All, thanks for the comments. It absolutely will be a challenge, and it may not happen until the CEO has the kind of meltdown I described - there is simply too much at stake for the various &quot;emperors&quot; out there.

I really think web analytics will drive some of this - the success folks are having with a cross-silo attitude and &quot;unified analytics&quot; approach are highly visible, and at some point, someone is going to ask, &quot;Why don&#039;t we use this approach elsewhere in the company?&quot;. That will be the beginning.

To be clear, I don&#039;t have a problem with &quot;brands&quot;, but I include the entire customer experience in the definition of one. I do have a problem with &quot;branding&quot;, meaning the use of impression tonnage to try and convince people your company or product is &quot;this&quot;. Your company or product is only &quot;this&quot; if &quot;this&quot; is the experience people have with it.  There is way too much transparency now to get away with the &quot;if they have an ad on TV everybody must be using it and love it&quot; consumer mentality of the 50&#039;s.

After all, many great brands have been created without doing ANY &quot;branding&quot; style advertising at all. The challenge is for marketing folks to understand how this is done and do it for their company, and a lot of this work involves understanding the role service and &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketingroi.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/ing-directs-emotional-connection-with-customers/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;excellent process execution&lt;/a&gt; plays in a brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All, thanks for the comments. It absolutely will be a challenge, and it may not happen until the CEO has the kind of meltdown I described &#8211; there is simply too much at stake for the various &#8220;emperors&#8221; out there.</p>
<p>I really think web analytics will drive some of this &#8211; the success folks are having with a cross-silo attitude and &#8220;unified analytics&#8221; approach are highly visible, and at some point, someone is going to ask, &#8220;Why don&#8217;t we use this approach elsewhere in the company?&#8221;. That will be the beginning.</p>
<p>To be clear, I don&#8217;t have a problem with &#8220;brands&#8221;, but I include the entire customer experience in the definition of one. I do have a problem with &#8220;branding&#8221;, meaning the use of impression tonnage to try and convince people your company or product is &#8220;this&#8221;. Your company or product is only &#8220;this&#8221; if &#8220;this&#8221; is the experience people have with it.  There is way too much transparency now to get away with the &#8220;if they have an ad on TV everybody must be using it and love it&#8221; consumer mentality of the 50&#8217;s.</p>
<p>After all, many great brands have been created without doing ANY &#8220;branding&#8221; style advertising at all. The challenge is for marketing folks to understand how this is done and do it for their company, and a lot of this work involves understanding the role service and <a href="http://marketingroi.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/ing-directs-emotional-connection-with-customers/" target="_blank">excellent process execution</a> plays in a brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I think few can argue on any logical level and say that your advice here isn&#039;t good... but it can be very dangerous to go about pointing out that the emperor has no clothes! Not saying it shouldn&#039;t be done, but some caution and political adroitness is necessary in most cases, I would think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think few can argue on any logical level and say that your advice here isn&#8217;t good&#8230; but it can be very dangerous to go about pointing out that the emperor has no clothes! Not saying it shouldn&#8217;t be done, but some caution and political adroitness is necessary in most cases, I would think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Jim, great post. While a firm like the one I work at would probably love to be the &quot;master record keeper&quot;, in all good faith I would recommend to any CMO that it absolutely must be an IN-sourced function. Otherwise, its like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.

But, alas, I don&#039;t see it happening in too many firms too quickly. The analytics groups don&#039;t have the clout and the strategic vision to take the macro view. 

The &quot;brand folks&quot; (as you call them) will play whack-a-mole with these analytical initiatives and proposals popping up down and then in an attempt to keep them down.

But over time, I think what you laid out will happen.... it&#039;s a matter of when, not if.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, great post. While a firm like the one I work at would probably love to be the &#8220;master record keeper&#8221;, in all good faith I would recommend to any CMO that it absolutely must be an IN-sourced function. Otherwise, its like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.</p>
<p>But, alas, I don&#8217;t see it happening in too many firms too quickly. The analytics groups don&#8217;t have the clout and the strategic vision to take the macro view. </p>
<p>The &#8220;brand folks&#8221; (as you call them) will play whack-a-mole with these analytical initiatives and proposals popping up down and then in an attempt to keep them down.</p>
<p>But over time, I think what you laid out will happen&#8230;. it&#8217;s a matter of when, not if.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Nice thoughts here. While lying with statistics is nothing new, the notion that being brutally honest might be more lucrative in the long run is definitely a whack upside the head for most marketing and sales departments. We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice thoughts here. While lying with statistics is nothing new, the notion that being brutally honest might be more lucrative in the long run is definitely a whack upside the head for most marketing and sales departments. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adelino de Almeida</title>
		<link>http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Adelino de Almeida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jimnovo.com/2007/02/14/medium-metric/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>And this is why time series analysis/marketing mix modeling is so important a capability: a good model can estimate the contribution of each medium to the outcome (sales, click, calls, etc.). It can even account for non-traditional media such as sponsorships, endorsements, naming rights, etc. and can do all that at an aggregate level, that is, without resorting to client level data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is why time series analysis/marketing mix modeling is so important a capability: a good model can estimate the contribution of each medium to the outcome (sales, click, calls, etc.). It can even account for non-traditional media such as sponsorships, endorsements, naming rights, etc. and can do all that at an aggregate level, that is, without resorting to client level data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
